Better, since a very important factor we *do* display is we-all face social monosexism-i

Essential disclaimer: earlier, whenever I made use of the term aˆ?share all of our experience,aˆ? I am not at all insinuating that BMNOPPQ folks all express the same sexual records, or undertaking the sexualities into the very same ways. We really do not. We all have been various. We are all drawn to different types of men, different types of bodies, various kinds of gender expressions. Each of us fall at rather different spots along the feared aˆ?Kinsey level.aˆ? Some of us are more immersed in queer communities, while some of us largely exist in directly communities, and many (otherwise many) folks get a hold of our selves constantly navigating the ways within (and between) both queer and direct communities.


So if we are all therefore various, next the reason why actually make an effort to attempt to label or lump collectively BMNOPPQ everyone? e., the presumption that being specifically drawn to people in an individual intercourse is actually for some reason natural, genuine, or legitimate than becoming keen on people in more than one gender.